Exercise.com vs TeamUp
Both score 8.0/10. Compare features and pricing below.
Both score 8.0/10. Exercise.com stands out for workout programming and delivery, ideal for trainers and gyms selling online training alongside in-person. High starting price and no public pricing are barriers. Not the best fit if you only need scheduling and billing.
Exercise.com Rank
#2 of 15
Rank
#3 of 15
Features
18/18
Features
16/18
Starting at
$239/mo
Starting at
$119/mo
User reviews
4.7/5 (355)
User reviews
4.6/5 (610)
What they cost
| Exercise.com | TeamUp | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting at | $239 /mo | $119 /mo |
| Free trial | No | 14 days |
| Number of plans | 1 | 2 |
What the pricing really means
At first glance, TeamUp looks cheaper at $119/month vs $239/month. But sticker price is only part of the story. Look at what is included on the base plan, how many users you get, and whether you need add-ons to get the features you actually need. The $99/month plan that requires $200 in add-ons is actually more expensive than the $250/month plan that includes everything.
Where Exercise.com wins
- Best-in-class workout and program builder with automated progression
- Highest-rated customer service at 4.9/5 on Capterra
- Custom branded apps for iOS and Android included
- Covers in-person gym ops, online training, and e-commerce
Where TeamUp wins
- All features included at every pricing level with no upselling
- Transparent customer-count pricing capped at $309/mo for 601+
- Unlimited locations at no extra charge
- 14-day free trial with month-to-month billing
Where Exercise.com falls short
- No transparent public pricing, must go through sales
- Higher starting price at $239/mo for solo trainers
- Complex interface with steeper learning curve
- No consumer marketplace like Mindbody
Where TeamUp falls short
- No workout/program builder for training delivery
- $119/mo starting price higher than some competitors entry
- No consumer marketplace for client discovery
- Branded app is $89/mo extra
Who is each product built for?
Exercise.com
Target: 1-10 locations
Exercise.com stands out for workout programming and delivery, ideal for trainers and gyms selling online training alongside in-person. High starting price and no public pricing are barriers. Not the best fit if you only need scheduling and billing.
TeamUp
Target: 1-10 locations
TeamUp is excellent for group fitness operators valuing simplicity and transparency. All-features-included model and price cap make costs predictable. Near-perfect reviews reflect genuine satisfaction. Lacks workout tools and marketplace so best for studios with established client bases.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Exercise.com | TeamUp |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduling & Booking | ||
| Class/session scheduling | ||
| Online booking | ||
| Attendance tracking | ||
| Members & Staff | ||
| Member management | ||
| Membership plans | ||
| Staff management | ||
| Client portal/app | ||
| Payments & Billing | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Automated billing | ||
| Retail/POS | ||
| Fitness Tools | ||
| Workout/program builder | ||
| Mobile app (client) | ||
| Mobile app (staff) | ||
| Waivers/forms | ||
| Marketing & Growth | ||
| Website builder | ||
| Marketing/email tools | ||
| Reporting/analytics | ||
| Integrations/API | ||
Common questions
TeamUp is designed for 1-10 locations, making it a better fit for small shops. Exercise.com targets 1-10 locations.
Exercise.com starts at $239/month. TeamUp starts at $119/month. Pricing was last verified in 2026-03-01.
No, Exercise.com does not offer a free trial. You will need to contact sales or sign up for a paid plan.
Yes, you can switch between Gym & Fitness Studio tools. The main effort is migrating your data and setting up new workflows. Plan for 1-2 weeks of overlap where you run both systems.
The bottom line
Pick Exercise.com if...
Personal trainers and gym owners who need robust workout programming and delivery alongside management features.
Pick TeamUp if...
Group fitness studios and yoga studios wanting simple transparent pricing with all features and no per-feature gating.